Compare

Soniox vs Azure
for Malay speech-to-text

Higher accuracy, real-time translation, and simpler integration than Azure for Malay.

Developers choose Soniox for accuracy in Malay

Malay is spoken by 290 million people worldwide — across Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, and beyond. Developers need transcription and translation that can keep up. Soniox delivers Malay speech recognition that works in the real world: accurate across accents, fast in live streaming, and seamless with translation built-in.

Azure Speech-to-Text, while integrated with Microsoft’s ecosystem, comes with tradeoffs: lower accuracy in noisy audio, laggier streaming, and more complexity when combining multiple services.

Soniox makes it simple. One API gives you transcription, two-way translation, diarization, timestamps, and confidence – without hidden costs or extra steps.

Higher accuracy in Malay speech

Soniox delivers production-ready accuracy on real-world speech: 9.8% WER in Malay vs 20.7% for Azure.

Streaming that feels live

Apps feel smooth and human with token-level updates, refinements, and full transcript control in Malay.

One API for transcription + translation

Soniox includes transcription + two-way translation and more in Malay with one call. Azure requires separate Translator and Custom Speech.

Helping startups and enterprises ship real world voice apps

Samsung
Deliver Health
Avodah
Mobius
Scribe
Agora

See the difference for yourself

Don’t just take our word for it. Run the same Malay audio through Soniox and Azure in real time and compare live results, side by side.

This demo isn’t pre-recorded. It makes real API calls to Azure and Soniox in real time, with each service tuned for its best performance. The framework is open source, so you can inspect or run it yourself.

Soniox vs Azure at a glance

And the benchmarks back it up.
In a 2025 study across 60 languages and real-world YouTube audio, Soniox reached 9.8% WER in Malay vs 20.7% for Azure.

View the full benchmark report »

The fastest and simplest alternative to Azure

Get Malay accuracy you can count on.

Your app only works if the transcript is right. Soniox consistently outperforms Azure in Malay on messy, real-world speech, like calls, Youtube clips, and multi-speaker conversations.

Malay WER Soniox 9.8% vs Azure 20.7%.

Azure accuracy drops outside clean audio.

Deliver real-time experiences in Malay that feel natural.

With token-level updates in milliseconds, Soniox keeps captions and assistants responsive. Developers can refine results, finalize early, or detect endpoints, so apps feel smooth and human.

Azure’s segment-based streaming lags and lacks developer controls.

Build globally without extra services.

Soniox includes transcription, diarization, timestamps, confidence, and two-way translation in the same stream. One API call works for 60+ languages, including Malay.

Azure requires stitching Speech-to-Text with Translator and Custom Speech, adding complexity and cost.

Save more as you scale.

At ~$0.10–0.12/hr, Soniox includes all features in one price. That means you save 2-5x vs Azure’s $0.24–0.48/hr, with no add-on Translator fees.

Azure costs more and charges separately for translation/customization.

Pay 2-5x less than Azure

With Soniox, transcription, translation, diarization, timestamps, and confidence are all included in one price. Azure charges more per hour and requires multiple services (Speech-to-Text + Translator + Custom Speech) for the same functionality.

Effective hourly cost (typical speech)
Soniox: ~$0.10/hour (async), ~$0.12/hour (streaming)
Azure: ~$0.24–0.48/hour (depending on region/model)

Soniox (async)Soniox (streaming)Azure
100 hours~$10~$12~$24-48
1,000 hours~$100~$120~$240-480
1,000 hours~$1,000~$1,200~$2,400-4,800

Takeaway: Soniox costs 2–5x less than Azure, with all features included in one API. At scale, that means saving thousands while reducing integration overhead.

Notes:

  • Soniox bills per token, which works out to the effective hourly rates above for typical speech.
  • Azure pricing varies by region, model, and usage tier. Translation via Azure Translator is billed separately, and Custom Speech may add further costs.
  • Comparisons use publicly listed rates as of 2025. Benchmarks and pricing are based on real-world audio workloads, with each service configured for best available performance.

See full Soniox pricing »

Frequently asked questions about Soniox vs Azure


Is Soniox cheaper than Azure for Malay?

Yes. Soniox costs ~$0.10–0.12/hr. Azure costs ~$0.24–0.48/hr depending on region and model, plus extra for translation/customization.


Does Azure support more languages than Soniox?

Azure lists 100+, but accuracy is inconsistent. Soniox supports 60+ with production-ready accuracy and built-in two-way translation.


Do I need multiple APIs for Malay with Azure?

Yes. Azure typically requires combining Speech-to-Text, Translator, and Custom Speech. Soniox includes everything in one call.


Does Azure support diarization and timestamps?

Yes, but Soniox provides them faster and in real time.


Can Soniox handle multiple languages, such as English and Malay, in one stream?

Yes. Soniox auto-detects and supports mid-conversation shifts. Azure requires pre-selecting one language per request.


Does Azure support two-way translation?

No. Azure requires Translator as a separate service and typically supports one-way flows. Soniox delivers two-way, in-stream translation in the same API call.


Get started with Malay transcription today

Start building

Create your account and generate an API key. Includes $200 in free credits.

Explore the docs

Find guides, API reference, and code samples to help you build fast.

Join our Discord

Ask questions, get feedback, and connect with other builders.