Soniox vs OpenAI
for Kazakh speech-to-text
Higher accuracy, richer real-time features, and lower cost for Kazakh transcription.
Developers choose Soniox for real-time, real world Kazakh fluency
Kazakh is spoken by 13 million people worldwide — primarily in Kazakhstan, with speakers around the world. Soniox delivers production-ready transcription and translation for Kazakh, handling regional accents, code-switching, and real-world audio conditions. OpenAI lists Kazakh as supported, but benchmark results show far higher error rates compared to Soniox.
If you need higher real-world accuracy for Kazakh, live streaming features built for apps, and lower cost at scale, Soniox is the better fit. OpenAI’s new Realtime API combines transcription and voice output in one API, designed for full voice agents. But it costs more for lower accuracy than Soniox, and lacks diarization, supports only one-way translation into English, and doesn’t provide the structured metadata (timestamps, confidence, manual finalize) that developers rely on.
Higher accuracy in Kazakh, and 60+ languages
Kazakh Word Error Rate 9% for Soniox vs 34.4% for Google (lower is better).
Live streaming features, out of the box
Real-time token streaming, diarization, and Kazakhtranslation in the same stream.
Lower cost, higher value
Pay up to 10x less than OpenAI, which charges more and requires multiple endpoints.
Helping startups and enterprises ship real world voice apps
See the difference for yourself
Don’t just take our word for it. Run the same Kazakh audio through Soniox and Deepgram in real time and compare live results, side by side.
This demo isn’t pre-recorded. It makes real API calls to OpenAI and Soniox in real time, with each service tuned for its best performance. The framework is open source, so you can inspect or run it yourself.
Soniox vs OpenAI at a glance
| Feature | Sonioxstt-rt-preview-v2 | OpenAIgpt-4o-transcribe |
|---|---|---|
| Single Multilingual Model | ||
| Language Hints | ||
| Language Identification | ||
| Speaker Diarization | ||
| Customization | ||
| Timestamps | ||
| Confidence Scores | ||
| Translation One Way | ||
| Translation Two Way | ||
| Endpoint Detection | ||
| Manual Finalization |
And the benchmarks back it up.
In a 2025 study across 60 languages and real-world YouTube audio, Soniox reached 9% WER in Kazakh vs 34.4% for OpenAI.
View the full benchmark report »
One call. All features. No compromises.
One API, global by default.
Soniox supports 60+ languages with production-ready accuracy in a single model. One call works for 13 million Kazakh speakers.
Unlike OpenAI, which splits transcription, translation, and streaming across multiple APIs, and struggles in major languages like Hindi and Mandarin.
Streaming in Kazakh that feels live.
Token-by-token updates appear in milliseconds and stabilize as words finish. Captions don’t lag, and assistants respond in sync.
OpenAI’s Realtime API supports live transcription, but without diarization, multi-language translation, or transcript metadata. Soniox includes all of these in one stream.
Designed for real-world Kazakh speech.
Soniox doesn’t stop at transcription. It translates speech in real time, handling accents, slang, overlap, and language shifts with aplomb.
OpenAI only supports one-way translation into English, with no in-stream two-way translation or speaker handling.
Ship faster, with fewer moving parts.
Instead of patching together multiple vendors or APIs, Soniox gives you transcription, translation, and diarization in one call.
With OpenAI, you’ll be managing separate endpoints and extra tooling.
Pay 2-10x less than OpenAI
With Soniox, all features are included in one price: transcription, streaming, diarization, translation, and 60+ languages. OpenAI charges more and splits features across different endpoints.
Effective hourly cost (typical speech)
Soniox: ~$0.10/hour (async), ~$0.12/hour (streaming)
OpenAI: ~$0.38–$1.15/hour
| Soniox (async) | Soniox (streaming) | OpenAI mini-transcribe | OpenAI 4o-transcribe | OpenAI Realtime (est $/hr*) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 hours | ~$10 | ~$12 | $18 | $36 | $38-$115 |
| 1,000 hours | ~$100 | ~$120 | $180 | $360 | $380-$1,150 |
| 1,000 hours | ~$1,000 | ~$1,200 | $1,800 | $3,600 | $3,800-$11,500 |
Takeaway: Soniox costs 2–10x less than OpenAI. At scale, enterprises save $200K–$1M+ over 3 years, while getting higher accuracy and richer features.
What about OpenAI’s new Realtime API?
- OpenAI now charges per token:
- $32 per million input tokens
- $64 per million output tokens
- Works out to ~$0.38/hour for transcription or ~$1.15/hour with audio output.
- Soniox remains ~$0.10–$0.12/hour, with all features included.
*Note: Soniox and OpenAI Whisper are shown as effective $/hour. OpenAI Realtime API is billed per token. Estimates assume typical conversational speech. See full Soniox pricing »
Frequently asked questions about Soniox vs OpenAI
How accurate is Soniox vs OpenAI for Kazakh?
In benchmarks, Soniox achieved 9% WER on real-world Kazakh audio, compared to 34.4% for OpenAI. This makes Soniox significantly more production-ready for Kazakh.
Can Soniox handle regional Kazakh accents?
Yes, Soniox is trained to handle messy, real-world audio with varied Kazakh accents, multiple dialects, and overlapping speech.
Is Soniox cheaper than OpenAI?
Yes. Soniox is billed per token, which works out to about $0.10/hour async or $0.12/hour streaming for typical speech (Soniox pricing).
OpenAI’s costs are higher:
- $0.18/hour for gpt-4o-mini-transcribe
- $0.36/hour for gpt-4o-transcribe (OpenAI pricing).
- ~$0.38–$1.15/hour for the new Realtime API, depending on whether you generate audio output (OpenAI Realtime)
That means Soniox is typically 2–10x less expensive, while also including features like real-time diarization, translation, and structured transcript metadata by default.
Does Soniox support more languages than OpenAI Whisper?
Soniox supports 60+ languages with production-ready accuracy and can translate between any pair of supported languages, including Kazakh. OpenAI’s Whisper was trained on ~99 languages, but production quality is strong only in a few (like English and Spanish). Many others, including widely spoken languages such as Hindi and Mandarin, are effectively unusable for real-world apps.
With Soniox, one API automatically works for 8 billion people worldwide.
Does OpenAI include diarization or translation in real time?
No. The Realtime API handles low-latency transcription and voice responses, but does not support diarization, multi-language translation, or transcript metadata. Soniox includes all of these in the same API call.
What makes Soniox streaming different from OpenAI?
Soniox streams token-by-token in milliseconds with non-final → final markers, so apps feel instant and stable. OpenAI’s Whisper is batch/file-based, and the Realtime API doesn’t include diarization or built-in translation.
Do I need multiple APIs with OpenAI?
Yes. OpenAI splits transcription (Whisper Audio API), translation, and live streaming (Realtime API) across different endpoints. Soniox provides transcription, translation, diarization, timestamps, and more in one API call.
Are Soniox benchmarks public?
Yes. Soniox published a 2025 benchmark study across 60 languages using real-world YouTube audio. In Kazakh, Soniox achieved 9% WER vs 34.4% for OpenAI. The best way to compare tools is to test Soniox vs OpenAI yourself using the live comparison tool.
Soniox surpasses OpenAI in any language
Get the most accurate, real-time speech-to-text transcription and translation in 60+ languages
Build faster with one API
Start building
Create your account and generate an API key. Includes $200 in free credits.
Explore the docs
Find guides, API reference, and code samples to help you build fast.
Join our Discord
Ask questions, get feedback, and connect with other builders.